Engaging Conversations on Healthcare and Technology

  • TwitterFacebookRSS

EMR Standards – A “C” Change

The Continuity of Care Document (CCD) was approved earlier this week. The CCD is a collaborative effort between the HL7 standards and ASTM International organizations. To add to confusion, there are multiple standards for electronic patient record (EMR / EHR) integration. They are:

CCD is a part of the healthcare interface standards “harmonization” effort, which is worthwhile and needed. Regardless, it creates confusion in the marketplace as to which standard to use or ask for when evaluating EMR and EHR systems as well as in determining the overall connected healthcare community strategy for a hospital, lab, clinic, or imaging center.  Which one?  CCR, CDA, or CCD?

In a Modern Healthcare article entitled CCD Standard Up for a Vote, there is a quote from the American Academy of Family Physician’s Center for Health Information Technology as to why the different standards.

“There isn’t really a rift between ASTM and HL7. I think where the rift starts to come is between legacy vendors and some of the Internet-technology-based vendors. You have the large hospital vendors (more or less in the HL7 camp) and the smaller physician office system vendors (using CCR). That’s where the controversy starts to explode.”

Peter Waegemann, chief executive officer of the Medical Records Institute, adds to this in a subsequent Modern Healthcare article entitled Standards Rivals’ Collaboration Could Have Major Impact:

“Vendors and users of large IT “legacy” systems that are backers of HL7’s Clinical Document Architecture will gain the most benefit from the CCD because they will be able to use the CCR format in their systems, Waegemann said. But the collaboration with HL7 on the CCD further establishes the CCR, he said.”

Both are valid points. The good news in this announcement is that CCR and CCD will work well together. This will facilitate a more integrated healthcare environment. As clinics, hospitals, labs, and imaging centers move forward, they will need to continue to be adaptive in their integration approach. Flexibility is essential in the near term.

Related posts:

  1. What Is the HL7 Continuity of Care Document?
  2. How Do CCR and CDA Compare?
  3. Formal Article / Publication Comparing CDA and CCR
  4. What Are the Different Standards in Healthcare?
  5. How Do I Get a Copy of the HL7 Specification / Manual?
Posted in CCD, CCR, CDA, EHR, EMR, HL7 Standards
  • http://www.hl7connection.com/2007/04/09/himss07-is-over-now-what/ HL7 Connection: HL7 for the rest of us…: » HIMSS07 Is Over, Now What?

    [...] Read blog posts on CCR, CDA, CCD, or just search our blog site. [...]

  • http://hl7standards.com/blog/2007/08/10/how-do-hl7-and-xml-coexist-in-clinical-interfacing/ How Do HL7 and XML Co-Exist in Clinical Interfacing?

    [...] There are a number of ‘new’ healthcare standards that are beginning to be implemented in clinical interfacing today. Acronyms such as CCR, CDA, and CCD are becoming common words in everyday interfacing discussions. While most interfaces today are using the HL7 2.x encoded format, these new standards are choosing to use XML as their message format. [...]

  • http://hl7standards.com/blog/2007/08/30/how-widely-adopted-is-hl7/ How Widely Adopted Is HL7?

    [...] “HL7 2.X messaging standard.” A much smaller number of people mean HL7 3.X, CCOW, EHR, CCD, CCR, CDA, [...]

  • http://hl7standards.com/blog/2007/08/31/emr-interfacing-best-practices/ EMR Interfacing Best Practices

    [...] Records (EMR) is increasing. This increase is due to the rising adoption of EMR systems, emerging clinical healthcare data standards (HL7, CCR, CDA, CCD, ELINCS), and increasing interoperability requirements, such as CCHIT [...]

  • http://hl7standards.com/blog/2007/03/05/himss-07-is-over-now-what/ HIMSS07 Is Over, Now What?

    [...] blog posts on CCR, CDA, CCD, or just search our blog [...]

  • http://hl7standards.com/blog/2007/05/23/ehr-innovation-is-happening/ EHR Innovation – It’s Happening

    [...] HL7 and ASTM have “harmonized” the continuity of care standards to bring together the HL7 CCD and ASTM CCR [...]

  • http://hl7standards.com/blog/2008/02/08/what-if-there-was-an-election-on-healthcare-standards/ What If There Was an Election on Healthcare Standards?

    [...] called the HL7Standards, but emerging factions are getting noticed whichare XML related – from Continuity of Care Record (CCR) to a faction-within-a faction, that is,HL7 V2, HL7 V3, HL7 Clinical Document Architecture [...]

  • http://ourownsystem.com/2008/03/14/9-the-paperless-hospital/ Our Own System » Blog Archive » 9. The Paperless Hospital

    [...] We’re on the verge of an extreme infusion of information technology into hospitals across the country. Electronic medical records (EMR) are the future of inpatient and outpatient record keeping. I see three fears holding back many: 1) cost of implementation, 2) technophobia, and 3) concern about purchasing the “right system.” [...]

  • http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/03/25/too-many-cooks-or-how-many-orgs-to-define-a-phr/ Defining a Functional Model for PHRs or How Many Cooks Does it Take? « Chilmark Research

    [...] within a PHR and must be mapped via an XML schema (insurers plan to use a combination of ICD-9 and CCD standards) for successful [...]

  • Dr Lavanian

    This struggle between the CCR and CDA is a clear example of how HIT standards are getting more and more complex as time goes by. This is leading to a cascading effect whereby IT is getting bloated, expensive and ending up squeezing the clinician like a Boa. An Example – I could write the BP of a patient with just a few pen strokes – “120/82 mm hg”. Now you need a complex, expensive program using a standard that could use more than a 1000 bytes to write the same thing ( I will avoid naming the standard). Who pays ?- it is finally the poor patient and some times, he pays with his life. I am a doctor who is into HIT since 1986 and am also earning a living from it. And yet, I am deeply pained by the way commercial needs are destroying many of the benifits that acrue from HIT, by raising prices insanely. I say, lets debulk, simplify and rationalize standards – and thereby lower costs of HIT. Let HIT be the means to an End rather than the End itself.

  • chris bickford

    CCR for oupatient EHR records, referrals and other such,
    but better if expressed as CCD that is harmonized with the
    current CDA R 2.0 standard..

    We need to be able to register in one system and have the
    other systems be able to decipher the standardized data
    fields..

    cbmd

  • http://www.hl7standards.com/blog/2007/08/31/emr-interfacing-best-practices/ EMR Interfacing Best Practices | HL7 Standards

    [...] Records (EMR) is increasing. This increase is due to the rising adoption of EMR systems, emerging clinical healthcare data standards (HL7, CCR, CDA, CCD, ELINCS), and increasing interoperability requirements, such as CCHIT [...]

  • http://www.hl7standards.com/blog/2007/08/10/how-do-hl7-and-xml-coexist-in-clinical-interfacing/ How Do HL7 and XML Co-Exist in Clinical Interfacing? | HL7 Standards

    [...] standards that are beginning to be implemented in clinical interfacing today. Acronyms such as CCR, CDA, and CCD are becoming common words in everyday interfacing discussions. While most interfaces today are [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus